Al-Tarawneh HA (2012) The main factors beyond decision making. J Manag Res 4(1):1–23
Google Scholar
Amponsah SK, Darkwah KF, Inusah A (2012) Logistic preference function for preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) decision analysis). Afr J Math Comput Sci Res 5(6):112–119
Article
Google Scholar
Anagnostopolous KP, Petalas C, Pisinaras V (2005) Water resources planning using the AHP and PROMETHEE multicriteria methods: the case of Nestos river—greece. In: The 7th Balkan Conference on Operational Research, Constanta, Romania, 2005
Anderson R, Mansingh G (2014) Data mining approach to decision support in social welfare. Int J Bus Intell Res 5:39–61
Article
Google Scholar
Athawale VM, Chakraborty S (2010) Facility location selection using PROMETHEE II method. In: Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on industrial engineering and operations management, Bangladesh, 9–10 January 2010
Barton H, Beynon MJ (2006a) “Getting to the Top”. Targeted police performance improvement, British Academy of Management (BAM), Belfast
Barton H, Beynon MJ (2006b) A question of rank: an investigation of the opportunities for police force performance ranking improvement across the UK. American Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA
Brans JP, Mareschal B (1992) PROMETHEE V: MCDM problems with segmentation constraints. INFOR: Inf Syst Oper Res 30(2):85–96
MATH
Google Scholar
Brans JP, Mareschal P (1994) The prometheegaia decision support system for multicriteria investigations. Investig Oper 4(2):107–117
Google Scholar
Brans JP, Mareschal B (1995) The PROMETHEE VI procedure: how to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems. J Decis Syst 4(3):213–223
Article
Google Scholar
Brans JP, Vincke PH (1985) A preference ranking organization method: (the PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making). Manag Sci 31(6):647–656
Article
MATH
Google Scholar
Brans JP, Mareschal B, Vincke P (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res 24(2):228–238
Article
MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar
Caron E, Daniels H (2013) Explanatory business analytics in olap. Int J Bus Intell Res 4:67–82
Article
Google Scholar
Charnes A, Cooper WW (1961) Management models and the industrial applications of linear programming. Wiley, New York
MATH
Google Scholar
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Ferguson RO (1955) Optimal estimation of executive computing by linear programming. Manag Sci 1(2):138–151
Article
MATH
Google Scholar
Ching-Ter C, Zheng-Yun Z, Huang-Mu C (2011) A goal programming modeling for telecommunication routing management. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 51:506–514
Google Scholar
Chromy E, Suran J, Kovacik M, Kavacky M (2011) Usage of Erlang Formula in IP Networks. Commun Netw 3(3):161–167
Article
Google Scholar
Contini B, Zionts S (1968) Restricted bargaining for organizations with multiple objectives. Econometrica 36:397–414
Article
MATH
Google Scholar
Deshmukh SC (2013) Preference ranking organization method of enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE). Int J Eng Sci Invent 2(11):28–34
Google Scholar
Diaz R, Behr GJ, Landaeta R, Longo F, Nicoletti L (2015) Modeling energy portfolio scoring: a simulation framework. Int J Bus Anal. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJBAN.2015100101
Article
Google Scholar
Figueira JR, Greco S, Roy B (2009) ELECTRE methods with interaction between criteria: an extension of the concordance index. Eur J Oper Res 199:478–495
Article
MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar
Figueira JR, Greco S, Roy B, Słowiński R (2013) An overview of ELECTRE methods and their recent extensions. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 20:61–85
Article
Google Scholar
Hirschberger M, Steuer RE, Utz S, Wimmer M, Qi Y (2013) Computing the nondominated surface in tri-criterion portfolio selection. Oper Res 61(1):169–183
Article
MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar
Ignaccolo M, Inturri P, García-Melón M, Giuffrida N, Pira ML, Torrisi V (2017) Combining analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with role-playing games for stakeholder engagement in complex transport decisions. Transp Res Procedia 27:500–507
Article
Google Scholar
Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (1951) Nonlinear programming. In: Proceedings of the second Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 481–492
Kumar S, Parashar N, Haleem A (2009) Analytical hierarchy process applied to vendor selection problem: small scale, medium scale and large scale industries. Bus Intell J 2(2):355–362
Google Scholar
Majumder M, Ghosh S (2013) Decision making methodology. Decision making algorithms for hydro-power plant location. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 21–26
Chapter
Google Scholar
Merkin BG (1979) Group choice. Wiley, New York
Google Scholar
Moffett A, Sarkar S (2006) Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: a minireview with recommendations. Divers Distrib 12(2):125–137
Article
Google Scholar
Nemhauser GL, Kan AHGR, Todd MJ (1989) Handbooks in operations research and management science, vol 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Google Scholar
Pearson JM, Ellram LM (1995) Supplier selection and evaluation in small versus large electronics firms. J Small Bus Manag 33(4):53
Google Scholar
Podvezko V, Podviezko A (2010) Dependence of multi-criteria evaluation result on choice of preference functions and their parameters. Technol Econ Dev Econ 16(1):143–158
Article
Google Scholar
Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in a hierarchichal structure. J Math Psychol 15:234–281
Article
MATH
Google Scholar
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
MATH
Google Scholar
Saaty TL (1986) Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Manag Sci 32:841–855
Article
MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar
Saaty TL (1990) An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”. Manag Sci 36:259–268
Article
Google Scholar
Saaty TL (2003) Decision-making with the ahp: why is the principal eigenvector necessary?”. Eur J Oper Res 145:85–91
Article
MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar
Singh RK, Garg SK, Deshmukh SG (2003) Opportunities and challenges for small and medium enterprises in India. In: Proceedings for national conference on recent development in mechanical engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India, 2003
Singh RK, Garg SK, Deshmukh SG (2005) Development of competences by Indian small, medium and large scale organizations. In: Proceedings of 14th international conference on mechanical engineering in knowledge age, Delhi College of Engineering, Delhi, India, 2005
Steuer RE (1986) Multiple criteria optimization: theory, computation and application. Wiley, New York
MATH
Google Scholar
Steuer RE, Na P (2003) Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance: a categorized bibliography. Eur J Oper Res 150(3):496–515
Article
MATH
Google Scholar
Tam CYM, Tummala VMR (2001) An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega 29:171–182
Article
Google Scholar
Triantaphyllou E, Mann SH (1995) Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges. Int J Ind Eng Theory Appl Pract 2(1):35–44
Google Scholar
Velasquez M, Hester TP (2013) An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int J Oper Res 10(2):56–66
MathSciNet
Google Scholar